skip to main |
skip to sidebar
......
Archive
......
......
Project 365 Blogs
Other Photography Blogs
Local Legends
......
Categories
- animals (6)
- antique (12)
- black (13)
- black and white (53)
- candid (49)
- cars and vehicles (25)
- city/urban (26)
- cyanotype (4)
- flash (25)
- flowers and plants (34)
- food and drink (17)
- indoors (121)
- landscape (26)
- off camera flash (32)
- outdoors (257)
- portrait (62)
- slow s. speed (28)
- sports (17)
- texture (12)
- white (23)
......
5 comments:
Nice bokeh. Did you use the 50mm?
I did. Its like the coolest lens ever. Though, F/1.2 would be awesome, too bad Nikon doesn't make one. :(
Do they make a F/1.4? I've heard they're better than the F/1.8, but good enough that you don't really need to spring for the F/1.2.
(When I say spring I mean that the F/1.2 for a canon is a "L" lens. So it's really costly and is not really worth it, but the F/1.4 apparently is.)
Yeah Nikon makes a 1.4. You're right, Canon's 1.2L is 4 times as expensive as the Canon 1.4. The price for a new 1.2 is, like, $1,300. I would rather get (if I shot Canon) a 16-35L, 24-70L or some huge lights. But look at these and tell me what you think.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pattersonminx/1445272895/in/set-72157594367563651/
Hmm, A bit to much soft focus for me. I looked at some other shots like..
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dawnm/310234502/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/simonnarramore/318618638/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sky-dreams-flyer/1454871958/
These I liked a lot!
I think the F/1.2 has it's place. Just not in everyone's wallet. Although the one advantage to getting a "L" lens is you do get a lens hood.
I also searched for some F/1.4.
I think these are also really good.
What do you think though?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/good10740/1413628645/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ktp/2480727252/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/a-althani/2337630113/
Post a Comment